Thursday, July 30, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 30


TEXAS:

Execution date set for convicted murderer


The state has scheduled the execution of a man who killed 3 Amarillo
teenagers in 1998.

John Lezell Balentine, 40, will be executed by lethal injection Sept. 30,
officials said. In 1999, a Potter County jury convicted and sentenced
Balentine to death for killing Mark Edward Caylor Jr., 17; Steven Brady
Watson, 15; and Kai Brooke Geyer, 15, as the trio slept in a home at 510
E. 17th Ave. in January 1998.

Each was shot once in the head. A 4th person asleep in a back bedroom was
not harmed.

Randall Sims, 47th District attorney, said Wednesday the state contacted
his office to schedule the execution as Balentine nears the end of his
appeals process. Sims' office then filed paperwork to request the date of
execution.

Sims said the victims' families were notified of the date.

Prosecutors have said Balentine confessed to the slayings.

They said he told police investigators that he targeted Caylor in his home
because he had repeatedly threatened Balentine and his friends after
Balentine had physically abused Caylor's sister, with whom he previously
had a relationship.

Balentine also told officials he was angered that Caylor and his friends
used drugs in the home while a baby also lived there, investigators said
during the trial.

According to his confession presented during trial, Balentine said he went
to Caylor's home and saw him asleep in the living room along with Watson
and Geyer.

When his .32-caliber pistol jammed, he fired the gun in the alley, then
crawled through a window, went to the living room and shot the teens as
they slept, according to his statement.

(source: Amarillo Globe-News)

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 29

TEXAS----new execution date

Yosvanis Valle has been given an execution date for Nov. 10; is should be
considered serious.

(sources: TDCJ & Rick Halperin)

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 28


TEXAS:

Father of slain infant: mom 'should burn in hell'


He waited for her on Saturday, hoping to see his son, Scott. The boy's
mother, Otty Sanchez, had called the husband, Scott Buchholz, and said she
would bring their 3-week-old infant son to Buckholz's mother's house on
the northeast side of San Antonio.

So Buchholz waited. Sanchez arrived an hour late, baby Scott in tow.

What he didn't know was that it would be the last time he'd ever see his
son.

Days earlier, Buchholz and Sanchez had broken up, and ever since, Buchholz
had become worried about his son. He says last week, Sanchez was admitted
to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. Sanchez was diagnosed with
schizophrenia at the hospital, Buchholz says.

The Associated Press confirms that other relatives have said Sanchez was
suffering from both schizophrenia and postpartum psychosis.

Buchholz, too, is a schizophrenic. At the age of 4, he sustained a head
injury when he fell out of a vehicle. When he joined the Army in the mid
1990s, he was given a psychiatric evaluation and diagnosed with
schizophrenia.

At the hospital, Sanchez hand wrote a letter outlining who should get
custody of her baby, Scott. The letter was never formally filed, though
from the document, it appears Sanchez was worried about losing her son to
Buchholz.

Upon being discharged from the hospital, she went to stay with her sister
and mother in the 300 block of Wayside Drive.

Finally, on Saturday, just hours before Sanchez allegedly decapitated,
mutilated and cannibalized her infant son, Sanchez and baby Scott arrived
at Buchholz's mother's home. There, Buchholz says he asked for copies of
the baby's birth certificate and other documents, but Sanchez grabbed the
baby and left. He says Sanchez left behind the baby's bag and formula,
along with her purse and medication.

Buchholz says his mother called 911 soon after. She was concerned because
Sanchez failed to properly secure the baby's car seat in the vehicle.

KENS 5 has requested a copy of the 911 phone call. The Bexar County
Sheriff's Office says the call may be part of the criminal investigation.

Buchholz last spoke with Sanchez by phone Saturday night. He was at a
Whitesnake and Judas Priest concert when Sanchez called him. He says he
asked her if they could be a family again. "She just stated that she
wasn't going to be with me no more, and she wasn't going to let me raise
my child," Buchholz said.

Sunday morning, around 5 a.m., police responded to a call on Wayside
Drive. There, they found Sanchez on a couch, crying. She told police that
she had killed baby Scott and wanted to kill herself.

Police allege that Sanchez used a knife and 2 swords to decapitate her
son. They say that she ingested several of the boy's body parts.

Sanchez was admitted to the hospital with 3 self-inflicted stab wounds. By
Tuesday afternoon, she was in the Bexar County Jail, being held on a $1
million bond. She's charged with capital murder.

Now Buchholz wants justice for his son. He says mental issues or not, he
believes Sanchez knew right from wrong and should be held accountable.

"I think she should be punished to the fullest extent of the law,"
Buchholz said. "That's what I think should happen. She killed my son; she
should burn in hell."

(source: KENS News)

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 28

TEXAS:

State to handle capital appeals


Texas, which executes more convicts than any other state in the nation,
will open its 1st capital defense office next year to manage appeals for
death row inmates after years of reports that appointed private attorneys
repeatedly botched the job.

"The status quo has been an international embarrassment," said state Sen.
Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, who sponsored the law that created the office. It
was supported by an unusual alliance between the State Bar of Texas, the
Court of Criminal Appeals and public defense advocates, who all backed it
in the last legislative session.

The law was inspired by a series of stories about Texas inmates who lost
crucial appeals after court-appointed attorneys missed deadlines or filed
only so-called "skeletal" writs documents with little information often
copied from other cases. It represents a significant reform for Texas, one
of the only capital punishment states that lacks a public defender to
oversee key death row appeals known as state writs of habeas corpus.

The office, with an annual budget of about $1 million and a staff of 9,
won't open soon enough to help any of the inmates whose appellate rights
were squandered recently.

"Better late than never," said Juan Castillo, 1 of 4 death row inmates
whose state appeals were never filed by the San Antonio attorney assigned
to represent them. "This is a start. There's a lot of cases" that have
been screwed up.

Ellis first introduced the bill in 2007 in response to reports about how
death row inmates' lawyers had mismanaged appeals. But the bill was
blocked then by last-minute lobbying from Harris County's former DA.

Deadlines blown

In the aftermath, appellate mistakes continued. The Houston Chronicle
reported earlier this year that 3 attorneys had repeatedly blown state or
federal appellate deadlines for their death row clients, effectively
surrendering their clients' rights to appeal. The Court of Criminal
Appeals recently found 2 attorneys in contempt of court for their shoddy
work, including Castillo's lawyer, Suzanne Kramer, and referred them to
the State Bar of Texas for possible disciplinary action.

Kramer has not responded to repeated requests for comment.

Governor signed bill

By the 2009 legislative session, remaining opposition to establishing a
state capital defense office had virtually disappeared, Ellis said. The
law was approved late in the session and signed by the governor last
month.

"I think that everyone agrees (death row inmates) deserve one fair shot at
presenting their issues, whether they're meritorious or not," said Andrea
Marsh, executive director of the Texas Fair Defense Project. "We saw too
many cases where poor state habeas representation forced people to lose
appeals."

The Office of Capital Writs will be funded by redirecting money already in
the state budget: $500,000 formerly used to pay private attorneys for
appeals and $494,520 from the state's Fair Defense account, already
earmarked for indigent defense. Ultimately, its attorneys will likely
handle most state appeals about 10 a year, if the current pace of death
sentences continues.

State writs of habeas corpus are considered the most critical step in
death row appeals. It is at that stage that any innocence claim,
allegation of prosecutorial misconduct, flawed trial defense or other
issue involving omissions or case errors must be raised or the arguments
cannot normally be raised later in the process.

The state writ of death row inmate Keith Thurmond, a former Montgomery
County mechanic on death row for the 2001 murders of his wife and her
lover, first was assigned to an inexperienced attorney who badly botched
it. He next was given a Houston attorney, Jerome Godinich, who failed to
file his federal appeal on time. Godinich, who has missed deadlines in 3
federal death row appeals, has blamed the mistake in Thurmond's case on
another lawyer and a faulty after-hours filing machine.

Thurmond fears that he will be executed before his innocence claim, or any
other challenges to the outcome of his 2002 trial, are ever heard by any
appellate judge.

"I'm lost," he said. "I don't know what to do. I haven't had no
representation since I've been here."

(source: Houston Chronicle)

****************************

Texas Seeks To Improve Image In Death Penalty Cases


Texas, the death penalty capital of the country, seems to be looking to
change its ways.

The state has passed legislation creating a capital defense office next
year, which will handle appeals for death row inmates, according to this
article from the Houston Chronicle.

The appellate office will have a staff of 9 and a budget of about $1
million.

Texas has gotten roundly criticized over the years for its handling of
capital murder cases. There have been strange capital murder tales coming
out of the Lone Star state in recent years, including a capital murder
defendant represented by a sleeping lawyer; a defendant sentenced to death
by a judge who allegedly was having a secret affair with the prosecutor in
the case; and a defendant who was executed after he was barred from filing
an appeal after the 5:00 pm closing time of the state's highest criminal
appellate court. That later case prompted a move to impeach Sharon Keller,
a judge on the state's court of criminal appeals.

The Chron reports that the legislation creating the capital defense office
was inspired by stories of Texas inmates who lost appeals because their
lawyers missed deadlines or filed "skeletal" writs, which contained only
scant information often copied from other cases.

"The status quo has been an international embarrassment," state senator
Rodney Ellis, who sponsored the legislation, told the Chron.

(source: Wall Street Journal)

********************

Slain infant's mother mentally ill, her family says


The 33-year-old San Antonio woman accused of decapitating her infant son
and eating parts of his body had been diagnosed with schizophrenia and
postpartum psychosis, family members said Monday.

Otty Sanchez said she killed Scott Wesley Buchholz Sanchez on Sunday with
a steak knife and two swords before mutilating the baby and eating parts
of his body, including his brain, nose and toes, police said.

She has been charged with capital murder and remained under 24-hour
observation Monday at University Hospital, where she was treated for
self-inflicted knife wounds.

The father of the baby now is asking that she receive the death penalty.

"She was a sweet person and I still love her, but she needs to pay the
ultimate price for what she has done," said Scott W. Buchholz, who
referred to his child as "baby Scotty."

Sanchez's relatives are hoping authorities will take into consideration
her history of mental illness, which included a recent diagnosis of
postpartum psychosis.

"It's just tragic and unbelievable what happened," said Greg Garcia,
Sanchez's first cousin who considers her a sister. "She was a good,
hard-working person, but she had been diagnosed with schizophrenia last
year."

Child Protective Services officials said the agency has never investigated
Sanchez. On Monday, the agency was at the home of the woman's mother,
where early Sunday morning police found the mutilated body. Sanchez is the
aunt to two young children, 5 and 6, who live there.

Police said the 2 children, their mother, and Sanchez's mother were in the
home at the time of the slaying. The adult women had taken turns caring
for baby Scotty at night. Sanchez's shift began at 1:30 p.m. Her sister
discovered the baby's body about 4:30 a.m. and called police about 5 a.m.

Sanchez told detectives that she was "hearing voices" and the devil made
her kill the baby boy she had given birth to June 30, police said.

The Bexar County District Attorney's Office will review the homicide
detectives' recommended capital murder charge, which is punishable by the
death penalty.

"You can still be prosecuted if you have some form of mental illness,"
said Bexar County First Assistant District Attorney Cliff Herberg. "The
test is if you understand the difference between right and wrong. The
question is whether or not you know your act is wrong."

Defense attorneys can request competency hearings to determine whether
Sanchez is fit to stand trial.

Relatives said Sanchez's mental health had severely deteriorated in the
week before baby Scotty's death. On July 20, she moved out of the home she
was sharing with the baby's father.

That day she checked herself into a hospital after hearing voices, but she
soon checked herself out. She then took the baby to her mother's home.
Buchholz called her every day to persuade her to return to their home.

She reappeared about 2 p.m. Saturday at Buchholz's parent's home.

"We were so happy to see Scotty again," said Buchholz.

She was at the home for about 15 minutes when Buchholz told Sanchez that
he needed a copy of baby Scotty's birth certificate and Social Security
card. The request seemed to set her off, Buchholz said.

"She grabbed the baby and just said, 'I gotta go. I gotta go. I'm out of
here.'"

Sanchez and Buchholz met in 2003, while enrolled in the San Antonio
College of Medical and Dental Assistance. The relationship was on and off
for the past 6 years, but they became more dedicated after learning she
was pregnant last year, relatives said.

Buchholz also has been diagnosed with schizophrenia. Buchholz said Sanchez
had been hospitalized for her mental illness at least once.

(source: San Antonio Express-News)

Monday, July 27, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 27

TEXAS:

Prosecutors Allow Death Penalty In Capital Murder Trial


In Corpus Christi, Judge Maricela Saldana said prosecutors will be allowed
to seek the death penalty in the capital murder trial of Charles Orr.

The defense attorney for Orr appeared before the judge and gave 16
different reasons as to why the judge should find the death penalty
unconstitutional in the case.

However, the judge denied all of the motions.

Charles Orr, 38, is accused of fatally shooting and killing 31-year-old
Jose Guadalupe Vasquez at the Christi Estates.

Orr's trial is set to begin August 14.

(source: KRIS TV News)

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 27

TEXAS:

Police: Woman Accused of Killing Newborn Ate Brain----Texas woman accused
of killing newborn son ate part of his brain, chewed off toes


A woman charged with murdering her 3 1/2-week-old son used a knife and 2
swords to dismember the child and ate parts of his body, including his
brain, before stabbing herself in the torso and slicing her own throat,
police said Monday.

Otty Sanchez, 33, is charged with capital murder in the death of her
infant son, Scott Wesley Buchholtz-Sanchez. She was recovering from her
wounds at a hospital, and was being held on $1 million bail.

San Antonio Police Chief William McManus said the early Sunday morning
attack occurred a week after the child's father moved out. Otty Sanchez's
sister and her sister's 2 children, ages 5 and 7, were in the house, but
none were harmed.

Otty Sanchez's aunt, Gloria Sanchez, said her niece had been "in and out"
of a psychiatric ward, and that the hospital called several months ago
looking to check up on her. She did not elaborate on the nature of her
niece's health problems.

"Otty didn't mean to do that. She was not in her right mind," a sobbing
Gloria Sanchez told The Associated Press on Monday by phone. She said her
family was devastated.

McManus, who appeared uncomfortable as he addressed reporters, said
Sanchez apparently ate the child's brain and some other body parts. She
also decapitated the infant, tore off his face and chewed off 3 of his
toes before stabbing herself.

"It's too heinous for me to describe it any further," McManus said.

McManus described the crime scene as so grisly that police officers barely
spoke to each other while looking through the house. Parts of the child
were missing, including pieces that Sanchez allegedly ate.

"At this particular scene you could have heard a pin drop," McManus said.
"No one was speaking. It was about as somber as it could have been."

Officers called to Sanchez's house at about 5 a.m. Sunday found her
sitting on the couch screaming "I killed my baby! I killed my baby!"
McManus said. They found the boy's body in a bedroom.

Police said Sanchez said the devil told her to kill her son and that she
was hearing voices.

"It was a spontaneous utterance," McManus said.

Police said Sanchez did not have an attorney, and they declined to
identify family members who might speak on her behalf.

No one answered the door Monday at Sanchez's 1-story home, where the
blinds were shut. A hopscotch pattern and red hearts were drawn on the
walk leading up to the house.

Neighbor Luis Yanez, 23, said his kids went to school with one of the
small children who lived at the house. He said he often saw a woman
playing outside with the children but didn't know whether it was Otty.

"Why would you do that to your baby?" said Yanez, a tire technician. "It
brings chills to you. They can't defend themselves."

Authorities said Sanchez and her sister took turns watching the baby
Sunday morning, and that the boy was placed in Sanchez's care at about
1:30 a.m. Her sister discovered what happened about three hours later and
called police.

Investigators are looking into Sanchez's mental health history to see if
there was anything "significant," and whether postpartum difficulties
could have played a role in the attack, McManus said.

The killing called to mind the drowning of 5 children by their mother in
the bathtub of their Houston-area home in 2001. Attorneys for the woman,
Andrea Yates, said she suffered from severe postpartum psychosis and, in a
delusional state, believed Satan was inside her and was trying to save
them from hell. A jury found Yates not guilty by reason of insanity in
2006.

(source: Associated Press)

Friday, July 24, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 24

TEXAS:

Death penalty sought in man's retrial for 1994 slaying


Prosecutors will seek the death penalty in a sentencing-phase retrial of a
man convicted in 1994 of bludgeoning, stabbing and strangling a former
foster parent to death in Galveston, District Attorney Kurt Sistrunk said
today.

Sistrunk had to decide whether to seek life imprisonment or the death
penalty for Gaylon George Walbey Jr., 35, after the 5th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals in January ordered the penalty phase be retried.

"In the review process it became clear why we sought the death penalty in
the original trial," Sistrunk said. "With all the same evidence
essentially available to us, along with witnesses, it was the only
decision to be had."

Galveston County District Judge Lonnie Cox will appoint an attorney for
Walbey if it's determined during a hearing next week that he is unable to
hire one.

A 3-judge appeals court panel said a new punishment trial was necessary
because Walbey's defense attorney failed to properly investigate Walbey's
troubled childhood. The court said the jury might have spared him the
death penalty if members had known how his father had snatched him from
his mother and severely abused him for 5 years.

Walbey was convicted of killing Marionette Beyah, 46, an office technology
instructor at Galveston College, in 1993 after she surprised him in the
act of burglarizing her home.

Beyah had been a foster parent for Walbey when he was 14, but she returned
him to state custody. Walbey said in a taped confession that he panicked
when Beyah began screaming.

The prosecution said Walbey, then 18, strangled Beyah with an electrical
cord, stabbed her with several knives, fractured her skull with a fire
extinguisher and left a long barbecue fork protruding from her back.

The jury took 40 minutes to find Walbey guilty of capital murder, but
deliberated for 5 1/2 hours during the penalty phase before sentencing him
to death.

(source: Houston Chronicle)

Thursday, July 23, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 23


TEXAS:

Stay of execution granted for man convicted in '99 Pleasant Grove murder


The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Wednesday granted a stay of
execution for a man who was to die today and ordered a lower court to
determine whether he deserves a new trial and whether he is mentally
retarded.

Defense attorneys had argued that Roderick Newton, who was found guilty of
kidnapping and murdering 20-year-old Jesus Montoya in a Pleasant Grove ATM
robbery in 1999, did not get a fair trial because police failed to hand
over evidence that would have questioned the credibility of a co-defendant
who testified against him.

The Dallas County district attorney's office supported Newton's attorney's
efforts to halt the execution after agreeing that Mesquite police withheld
a written statement that contradicted the co-defendant's testimony.

District Attorney Craig Watkins said he believes Newton is guilty and he
will prosecute him again if a new trial is granted.

"We've always thought he was guilty. We'll pursue the same punishment,"
Watkins said. But he added, "The process was less than perfect. ... We
have the responsibility to call a spade a spade."

First statement

David Finn, one of Newton's attorneys, and prosecutor Mike Ware, who
oversees the county's conviction integrity unit, say they believe police
never gave defense attorneys or prosecutors copies of co-defendant Julian
Williams' first statement to police.

In that statement, Williams denied any knowledge of the crime, according
to a copy of the handwritten statement. He also said he would not lie.

Williams later made two substantially different statements and took the
stand to testify that Newton shot Montoya as the man begged for his life.

Williams pleaded guilty after he testified and was sentenced to 10 years
in prison.

Finn also said Mesquite Police Officer Michael Meek testified at trial
that he took 2 statements from Williams not 3.

"It was not an oversight" that the first statement was never presented to
the defense, he said. "It was not an accident. It was not a mistake. The
detective should thank his lucky stars that the statute of limitations is
only 3 years for aggravated perjury."

Greg Davis, lead prosecutor during the original trial and now the No. 2
prosecutor in Collin County, said Wednesday that "nothing was withheld
from the defense."

He said that the defense attorneys reviewed the police file at the Police
Department before the trial. He added that he was not present at that
meeting.

"It was a premeditated and vicious killing, and Newton has never expressed
one word of remorse for his actions," Davis said.

"Besides the co-defendant's testimony, we had [a] witness who identified
Newton as the man who pawned Montoya's crucifix necklace after the murder,
Newton's prints on Montoya's vehicle, Newton's attempt to escape at the
time of his arrest and a confession to a cellmate that the defense called
to the stand. The evidence of guilt was overwhelming against Newton."

Finn said trial attorneys viewed only physical evidence at that meeting.

A Mesquite police spokesman, Lt. Bill Hedgpeth, on Wednesday declined to
discuss the case and referred questions to prosecutors. He said that he
has not spoken to Meek.

"My understanding is we made everything available to defense attorneys,"
he added.

DA's office

Finn credited the DA's office for its help in securing the stay. Although
Finn discovered the statement might exist, prosecutors found the document
at the Mesquite Police Department.

"They could have just looked the other way," Finn said. "And they didn't.
That speaks volumes about their integrity."

Withholding information that could benefit a defendant is commonly called
a "Brady violation."

Agreeing to a stay of execution is an unusual move for a prosecutor,
although Watkins has agreed to one before.

In September 2007, Watkins agreed to a stay of execution for Joseph Roland
Lave Jr. because a second polygraph examination of a co-defendant was not
given to the defense at trial. Lave is on death row, and prosecutors say
they believe he is guilty.

Retardation issue

The DA's office did not agree to Newton's stay on the issue of mental
retardation.

But in 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the mentally retarded
cannot be executed. They can be tried for capital crimes and sentenced to
life in prison if they understand the charges they face and can contribute
to their defense.

Neither the Supreme Court, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals nor the
state Legislature has laid out a definitive method to determine if
defendants are mentally retarded. But in several cases, defendants with
IQs below 70 have been spared the death penalty.

Newton's IQ is 61, according to court records.

No date has been set for proceedings by the original trial court to hold
hearings about the Brady violation and whether Newton is mentally
retarded. After that hearing, the appeals court would make a decision
based on the lower court's recommendation.

(source: Dallas Morning News)

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 22


TEXAS---impending execution stayed

Inmate set to die for '99 murder gets reprieve


The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on Wednesday stopped the scheduled
execution of a condemned inmate after misplaced evidence surfaced related
to the abduction, robbing and fatal shooting of a Dallas man a decade ago.

Roderick Newton, 31, was set to die Thursday. Prosecutors and defense
attorneys had anticipated a reprieve after Dallas County authorities gave
Newton's lawyers a police questionnaire uncovered in a review of the case.
The evidence was given to them within the last 2 weeks.

Newton was condemned for the death of Jesus Montoya, 20, of Dallas, who in
1999 was abducted from a car wash, forced to make an ATM withdrawal,
robbed of his jewelry and then shot and dumped in a vacant lot in
Mesquite.

Dallas County prosecutors cleared the way for the reprieve when they
agreed Tuesday with Newton's attorneys that the courts should review the
possible impact of the questionnaire, which was filled out by a key
prosecution witness at Newton's trial but never given to Newton's trial
lawyers.

It was the 1st of 3 statements made to Mesquite detectives by a
co-defendant who testified against Newton. Only 2, however, were known to
Newton's trial attorneys.

The inmate's appeals lawyers, seeking to block the lethal injection, told
the Court of Criminal Appeals it was improperly withheld and could have
been used to discredit the co-defendant's testimony.

Police arrested the co-defendant, Julian Paul Williams, whose fingerprints
were found in Montoya's truck, and Williams told them of Newton's
involvement in Montoya's slaying. He served a 10-year prison term and is
now free. Newton got death.

Prosecutors found the written questionnaire from Williams in a police file
while recently reviewing the 10-year-old case. In the questionnaire,
Williams told police he knew nothing of the slaying and wasn't involved, a
story he changed in subsequent statements.

The appeals court returned Newton's case to his Dallas County trial court
for a hearing on the evidence issue. The appeals court also agreed with
Newton's lawyers that their claim Newton was mentally impaired and
ineligible for execution should be reviewed.

The court dismissed other defense claims that Newton should have had a
hearing on his competency to stand trial and that he had deficient legal
help at his trial.

Newton had more than 2 dozen misdemeanor and felony offenses on his record
and was a probation violator when he became wanted for Montoya's slaying.
He was arrested hiding in a garbage bin after fleeing on foot following a
car chase that had ended with him crashing into a parked car.

Texas leads the nation with 16 executions this year. At least 10 inmates
have execution dates in the coming months. Scheduled to die next is David
Wood, 52, a convicted serial killer facing lethal injection Aug. 20 for
the slayings of 6 women and girls in the El Paso area over 3 months in
1987.

(source: Associated Press)

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 22

TEXAS:

Court of Criminal Appeals likely to grant stay of execution because
evidence withheld in Mesquite case


The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is expected to grant a stay of
execution to a Dallas County man on death row because Mesquite police
withheld evidence about a codefendant who testified against him, say
attorneys involved in the case.

Roderick Newton, 31, was sentenced to death in March 2000 for the
kidnapping, robbery and shooting death of 20-year-old Jesus Montoya of
Pleasant Grove. Another man charged in the crime, Julian Williams,
testified about the murder and said Montoya begged for his life before he
was killed.

Williams later pled guilty and was sentenced to 10 years in prison.

Newton is scheduled to be executed Thursday.

The Dallas County District Attorney's office agreed to the stay of
execution because they too believe evidence was withheld, said Mike Ware,
who oversees the DA's conviction integrity unit.

David Finn, one of Newton's attorneys, said he believes that police never
gave the information to prosecutors. The DA's office said the statement
was not found in their files.

Withholding information that could benefit a defendant violates is
commonly called a "Brady violation." The phrase refers to a 1963 U.S.
Supreme County case - Brady vs. Maryland - in which the court found that
prosecutors violate defendants' constitutional rights if they
intentionally or accidentally withhold evidence favorable to the defense.

Mesquite police have not yet returned phone calls asking about this case.

(source: Dallas Morning News)

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

death penalty news------TEXAS

July 21

TEXAS:

Texas inmate likely to get reprieve from execution


A convicted murderer facing execution this week for an abduction and
slaying a decade ago likely will get a reprieve after Dallas County
prosecutors turned over misplaced evidence to defense attorneys.

Attorneys for Texas death row inmate Roderick Newton said the 1st of 3
statements given to detectives by a co-defendant who testified against
Newton was improperly withheld from his trial lawyers. It could have been
used to discredit the codefendant's testimony but defense attorneys didn't
know it existed.

The claim was among several appeals issues Newton's attorneys filed with
the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, asking it to block the lethal
injection set for Thursday in Huntsville.

Newton, 31, was convicted in the death of Jesus Montoya, 20, of Dallas,
who was abducted from a car wash, forced to make an ATM withdrawal, robbed
of his jewelry and then fatally shot and dumped in a vacant lot in
Mesquite.

Police arrested Julian Paul Williams, whose fingerprints were found in
Montoya's truck, and Williams told them of Newton's involvement in
Montoya's slaying. Williams served a 10-year prison term and is now free.
Newton got death.

Dallas County prosecutors found a written questionnaire from Williams 1
of 3 statements he gave police in Mesquite in a police file while
reviewing the 10-year-old case within the past couple of weeks.

At Newton's trial, his attorneys were aware of only 2 statements.

In the newly discovered questionnaire, Williams told police he knew
nothing of the slaying and wasn't involved, denials trial attorneys could
have used to cast doubts on his later testimony.

The district attorney's office gave the statement to Newton's appeals
lawyers, who in their appeals court filing credited prosecutors for
"remarkable candor" in making the disclosure.

A ruling from the court will make the reprieve formal. Kimberly Schaefer,
an assistant district attorney who handles capital case appeals in Dallas
County, said it was nearly certain the execution would not take place.

"I've told the victim's family I'm 99.99 % sure the execution is not going
forward," she said.

One of Newton's lawyers, David Finn, said he expects the execution to be
postponed indefinitely.

Newton's lawyers also had raised claims he was mentally impaired, making
him ineligible for execution, a hearing should have been held on Newton's
competency to stand trial and he had deficient legal help at his trial.

Prosecutors opposed those claims but agreed to litigate the issue
involving the codefendant's recently discovered statement. One possible
outcome could be a new trial.

Newton had more than 2 dozen misdemeanor and felony offenses on his record
and was a probation violator wanted for Montoya's slaying when he tried to
elude police during an evening rush-hour chase in March 1999. After
slamming into a parked car and running off on foot, he was found a few
minutes later hiding in a garbage bin.

Police who arrested him had to use pepper spray to get Newton out of the
trash container.

(source: Associated Press)

***********************************

Plano killer of Brazilian couple loses appeal


A Texas man condemned for the slaying of a Brazilian man 9 years ago in
suburban Dallas has lost a federal court appeal of his conviction and
death sentence, moving him a step closer to execution.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling late Monday rejected the
appeal from 31-year-old Michael Sigala. Sigala is sentenced to die for the
fatal shooting of 28-year-old Kleber Santos. Santos and his 25-year-old
wife, Lilian, were gunned down at their apartment in Plano in August 2000.
The woman also was raped and the couple's wedding rings were stolen and
subsequently pawned.

Sigala told police the shootings were in self-defense. He does not have an
execution date.

(source for both: Associated Press)

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 21

TEXAS:

Respected magistrate hangs up his robes but will continue his research at
UT-Arlington


Allan Butcher was known as one of the top death-penalty attorneys in Texas
and an advocate for poor criminal defendants when he became a magistrate
quietly working away in the basement courtroom at the courthouse a decade
ago.

His switch from writing appeals for death row inmates to simply approving
pleas on routine legal matters may have bewildered others, but it made
sense to Butcher, who said the job gave him time to continue his research
and teaching.

"Most lawyers like the drama of the courtroom. I like the solitude of the
library," Butcher said.

Butcher, however, hung up his robes Friday after changes in the schedule
forced him to work 5 days a week, every week. That made it harder to
continue his research, especially into the courts indigent-defense system.

"When I took the job, we worked 7 days on and had 7 days off," Butcher
said. "That gave me a large block of time every other week to devote to my
research."

A 5-member judicial committee has screened about 35 applicants for the
magistrate's job and picked 6 finalists, who were interviewed Friday. The
county's 19 criminal court judges will make the final selection this week.

University life

By the time his successor takes the bench, Butcher plans to be back in his
office at the University of Texas at Arlington, where he will continue
researching the death penalty, indigency and judicial selection issues
that have become synonymous with his name.

Butcher had 3 careers before becoming a lawyer more than 30 years ago, and
he tried a few cases before finding his niche as an appellate attorney.
There, he earned a statewide reputation after winning reversals on 1/2 of
the 18 death penalty cases he appealed.

"He was probably the leading appellate lawyer that judges would use in
death-penalty cases," said state District Judge George Gallagher, who
practiced law with Butcher for 13 years. "He was considered the best
because of his thoroughness and knowledge of the law."

Butcher gave his best to all his clients, not just those facing the death
penalty, Gallagher said.

He recalled a case in which a defendant tried on a felony charge was
convicted of a misdemeanor. Still, Butcher appealed the case on the
grounds that the judge should have given the jury a legal definition of
reasonable doubt.

It took a year and a half before the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
agreed. Even though the court reversed itself 6 years later, Butcher
continues to fight for his clients and the law, Gallagher said.

"What struck me about this case is that it was really no big deal as far
as the severity of the offense," Gallagher said. "But Allan seized on what
he thought was a gap in the law and tried to change it."

Gatekeeper

Butcher gives the same careful attention to the hundreds of defendants
with whom he interacts only briefly, his staff say.

"He treats them as individuals," court coordinator Rita Dickerson said.
"He tries to convey how important it is for them to get an attorney in
time to do them some good but to get someone they're comfortable working
with."

Dickerson said Butcher is equally attentive to the police officers who
bring him search and arrest warrants to sign.

Butcher, a professor emeritus at UT-Arlington, acknowledges that his
teaching side kicks in when hes trying to ensure that officers include
details needed for him to sign the warrants.

"I'm the person between the police who want to search and the civilian's
right to privacy," he said. "The officer has to convince me he has the
reason to do it. I like to think that Im rigorous yet sensitive to the
rights of the defendant."

For the near future, Butcher will return to his research on indigent
defense, which already has improved poor defendants access to attorneys
throughout the state.

He'll also continue trying to find ways to ensure that the death penalty
is imposed in a fair and consistent way, although he no longer is sure
that is possible.

"I'm not ready to retire," Butcher said.

(source: Fort Worth Star-Telegram)

***********************

DA seeks death penalty for Brewer


Jury selection in the long-awaited sentencing of convicted killer Brent
Ray Brewer is on pace to conclude in 2 weeks, Randall County District
Court officials say.

There was no action in court Monday, which marked the 4th week into jury
selection. Attorneys are expected to resume the individual questioning of
potential jurors Aug. 3, District Clerk Jo Carter said.

They began with a pool of nearly 200 potential jurors on June 22.

Prosecutors hope to begin taking testimony from witnesses Aug. 10, court
records show.

Randall County Criminal District Attorney James Farren is seeking the
death penalty for Brewer a 2nd time.

Once seated, jurors won't have to weigh Brewer's guilt or innocence.
Another Randall County jury already did that, convicting the 39-year-old
of the April 26, 1990, stabbing death of Robert Laminack, 66.

At issue this time is whether he will have to pay with his own life.

Authorities have long held that Brewer and a companion approached
Laminack, the owner of Amarillo Floor Co., outside his South Western
Street business in Amarillo and asked for a ride to the Salvation Army. On
the way, Brewer stabbed Laminack to death and made off with his wallet,
containing $140.

A Randall County jury in 1991 found Brewer guilty of capital murder and
sentenced him to death.

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the sentence in April 2007, finding that
the lower court didn't instruct the jury to consider his mental history.

Kristie Lynn Nystrom, 41, is serving a life sentence after pleading guilty
to a capital murder charge in the case.

She was on the Randall County jail roster Monday and may be called to
testify. Brewer is represented by Anthony Odiorne, a court-appointed
lawyer from Lubbock.

Attorneys chose to question jurors one-by-one, a process that can be time
consuming but ultimately prove more thorough.

Visiting District Judge Quay Parker has presided over jury selection so
far, but 47th District Judge Hal Miner will oversee testimony during the
sentencing.

(source: Amarillo Globe-News)

Monday, July 20, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 20

TEXAS:

Texas reporter's seen unrivaled number of U.S. executions

Texas reporter has covered executions in Texas since the early 1980s

Graczyk stopped counting, didn't want "notches on my gun belt"

Inmates waiting to die have greeted him by name, called to check up on him

He says he doesn't worry about the mental toll and has declined counseling


It takes 7 minutes to execute a death row inmate, according to the state
of Texas.

Mike Graczyk poses outside the Texas death chamber prior to an execution
in January.

At that rate, Mike Graczyk has spent about 40 hours of his life watching
men -- and a few women -- die.

Graczyk, a correspondent for The Associated Press, is believed to hold a
macabre record. He's almost certainly watched more executions than anyone
else in the United States.

"I can't possibly imagine there's been someone present at more than Mike,"
said Michelle Lyons, the spokeswoman for the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice, which uses lethal injection at its execution chamber in
Huntsville.

Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, no state has executed more
inmates than Texas. And no one has witnessed more of them than Graczyk.

He's on the witness list for 315 of the state's 439 executions -- more
than any other reporter, prison employee or chaplain -- and no records
were kept for another 80.

In his early days, he kept count. But he eventually stopped. He didn't
want to know.

"In one circle, I was perceived as putting notches on my gun belt," the
59-year-old reporter said. "I didn't like that."

Prison regulations in Texas require The Associated Press to be given one
of the five designated media witness passes for each execution.

Texas execution facts

Texas executions since death penalty was reinstated: 439

Cost per execution for drugs used : $86.08

Average time on death row before execution: 10.26 years

Youngest inmate executed: 3 at 24

Oldest inmate executed: 66

Women executed: 3

Source: Texas Department of Criminal Justice Graczyk works in the AP's
Houston bureau -- it's closest to the state's execution chamber in
Huntsville. Since the early 1980s, he's made the hourlong drive north
almost every time an inmate has faced the needle.

The 1st was March 13, 1984, for the execution of James "Cowboy" Autry,
convicted of shooting a female store clerk between the eyes with a
.38-caliber revolver while arguing over a six-pack of beer.

She died, along with a former Catholic priest that Autry killed at the
crime scene.

"The first time definitely leaves an impression on you," Graczyk said.

There are others that stand out along the way.

Graczyk remembers Bob Black, convicted of killing his wife and trying to
collect the insurance money.

"I walked into the death house, and he was strapped to the table and he
said, 'Hey Mike, how are you doing?' It threw me for a loop."

Graczyk said it's normal for him to know the name of the condemned and not
uncommon for the reverse to be true. There have been others who greeted
Graczyk by name with a needle in their arm.

Once, while waiting to be let into the death house, a prisoner phoned him
in the media holding area.

It was the inmate whose execution Graczyk was about to witness.

"He said, 'I just wanted to call and make sure you were OK.' I was
flabbergasted."

Over the years, the inmate's name has slipped from Graczyk's memory, but
not the unexpected phone conversation.

"I don't think he had any family to call," he said.

There was Ponchai Wilkerson, who once nearly escaped from death row and,
years later, coughed up a handcuff key as he lay dying from his injection.

There was the "Candy Man," Ronald Clark O'Bryan -- convicted of poisoning
his child's Halloween candy with cyanide -- and the gauntlet of college
students wearing Halloween masks who showed up to cheer.

And Karla Faye Tucker, the first woman executed in Texas since the 1800s.
He remembers a network correspondent crying after her death -- and another
blow-drying his hair.

Of the entire death chamber ritual, Graczyk said, it's the final
statements that stick in his mind. Some have been confessions. Others were
denials.

Poetry. Prayers. Bible verses. Curses. Emotions ranging from defiance to
resignation.

There was Jonathan Nobles, an electrician who stabbed 2 people to death.
He sang "Silent Night."

"Ever since then, I think of him on Christmas or Christmas Eve when I'm in
church," Graczyk said. "That's the kind of thing that haunts you."

The person who may come closest to Graczyk's status also felt things that
haunted him.

Don Reid, a writer for the AP and, before that, a Texas newspaper,
witnessed 189 executions in the 1960s, when Texas still strapped inmates
to "Old Sparky," the nickname for the state's electric chair.

The experience changed Reid, who died in 1981, from a supporter of the
death penalty to an opponent. He wrote a book, "Have a Seat, Please,"
chronicling that transformation.

Graczyk said he doesn't worry about the mental toll of watching so many
deaths. His bosses with the AP have offered counseling. He's declined.

"To see someone go to sleep -- not to sound insensitive -- but the carnage
at the murder scene is harder than what you see in the death house in
Huntsville," he said.

Over a 25-year career, Graczyk said, the executions have only been a small
portion of his work. He finds balance in those other stories.

As a journalist, Graczyk never answers the question when friends ask his
own views on the death penalty.

"I'm not sure I really know," he said.

But as long as Texas keeps executing people, Graczyk said, it's important
that he keep showing up.

The next execution in Huntsville was scheduled for Thursday before the
condemned, convicted murderer Kenneth Mosley, was granted a reprieve until
September.

If he execution goes ahead then, Graczyk plans to make the drive.

"I would hate for the state of Texas to take someone's life and no one be
there," he said.

(source: CNN)

Call Your U.S. Senator Today!

From the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty:

Dear Abolitionists,

Today, Monday 7/20, the US Senate will be discussing amendments to the Dept. of Defense Authorization Bill, and we expect the introduction of an amendment to expand the federal death penalty. The Matthew Shepherd Hate Crimes Prevention Act has already been attached to the DOD Authorization bill, and Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama is expected to introduce an amendment making hate crimes eligible for the federal death penalty.

The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty asks YOU to call your U. S. Senators' offices and express your opposition to the death penalty and to vote AGAINST any expansion of the federal death penalty. You can reach the US Capitol switchboard at 202.224.3121 and ask for your Senator's office. If you do not know who your two U.S. Senators are, or for their direct office phone numbers and e-mail addresses, click here.

AFTER YOU CALL, forward this message to your friends, family, etc. and ask them to call, and then please also send an e-mail to each of your two Senators.

The vote is expected Monday afternoon by 3pm (you can watch on CSPAN), so please make your calls right now, and definitely before 3pm EDT TODAY!

Here are some talking points for your calls:
  • I am concerned that Senator Sessions reportedly intends to introduce an amendment to the Department of Defense Authorization that would expand the federal death penalty. As your constituent, I urge you to oppose any expansion of the federal death penalty.
  • The Department of Justice has found widespread geographical and racial disparities in the application of the federal death penalty
  • 135 individuals have been exonerated and released from death rows in this country, a stark reminder that innocent people across the country continue to face the threat of execution.
  • I urge you to uphold the fundamental principles of justice and human rights and oppose any expansion of the death penalty.

Thank you for your immediate action.

The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty202-331-4090

Sunday, July 19, 2009

death penalty news----TEXAS

July 19

TEXAS:

Execution date set for Reginald Blanton


An execution date has been set for 28-year-old Reginald Blanton, who was
convicted of fatally shooting an acquaintance and then stealing $79 worth
of jewelry that he later sold at a pawn shop.

Blanton's execution is set for Oct. 27, according to the Bexar County
District Attorney's office.

A Bexar County jury convicted Blanton of capital murder 8 years ago for
breaking into 22-year-old Carlos Garza's apartment and killing him April
4, 2000.

At his trial, prosecutors said Blanton kicked in Garza's door and shot him
twice in the head when he refused to hand over some jewelry.

Blanton was videotaped at a local pawn shop selling two gold necklaces
that belonged to Garza.

The execution date was set after both the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court denied appeals from the defendant. The
Supreme Court's rejection came May 18.

Blanton sought to have his conviction overturned because, among other
claims, he thought his attorney failed to adequately represent him during
jury selection, according to the Associated Press. Specifically, Blanton
claimed his attorney was ineffective "by failing to properly preserve an
objection to a prosecution request for a jury shuffle and failing to
preserve evidence showing the jury shuffle in his case was
discriminatory," according to an Associated Press report.

3 death row inmates from Bexar County have been executed so far this year,
according to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Blanton is
currently the only death row inmate from Bexar County to have a date of
execution set for this year.

(source: San Antonio Express-News)

********************

Death row inmate's appeal denied in Pampa triple-slaying


The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a death row inmate's
appeal of his conviction for the slaying of his girlfriend and her 2
mentally impaired sons on New Year's Eve 1993.

In a ruling posted late Tuesday, judges rejected Henry Watkins Skinner's
argument that defense attorneys at his capital murder trial should have
used a police blood-spatter report to bolster his defense.

Skinner, 47, was convicted of fatally bludgeoning Twila Jean Busby, 40,
with an ax handle and then fatally stabbing her sons Elwin Caler, 22, and
Randy Busby, 20, in their home in Pampa.

The court wrote: "Even taking the report at face value, Skinner overstates
its implications."

Skinner argued that the report showed that the blood on Elwin Caler came
from his mother, suggesting someone other than Skinner was the killer.

At his 1995 trial, Skinner's lawyers acknowledged that he was present at
the time of the killings but said he was passed out on the couch from a
combination of alcohol and codeine.

Skinner's case came under scrutiny in 2000 because of a lack of forensic
testing during the investigation, and questions about the behavior of
Skinners trial attorney, Harold Comer, who left his post as Gray County
district attorney after improperly borrowing $10,000 from a drug-seizure
fund.

(source: Fort Worth Star-Telegram)

Friday, July 17, 2009

No Posthumous Pardon from Perry

Austin Chronicle
JULY 17, 2009 BY JORDAN SMITH

The debate over whether Gov. Rick Perry is free to grant a posthumous pardon -without any change of law, without a constitutional amendment - is still raging: On July 6, the Legislative Council - which provides legal research and opinions to lawmakers - weighed in, opining that state laws are actually silent on the topic. "May the governor grant a legally effective posthumous pardon under current Texas law?" wrote Gabe Brake, a Lege Council attorney."Possibly." The law is "unclear on the question," and "no Texas court has squarely answered this question," he wrote.

At issue is a posthumous pardon for Timothy Cole, who died in prison while serving time for a 1985 rape in Lubbock that he did not commit. Cole was posthumously exonerated earlier this year, and since then his family has been seeking a pardon from Perry - so far, with no success.

Lawmakers failed to pass a joint resolution this spring that would have expressly granted the governor such power (the measure became a casualty of House chubbing). Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, said late last month that he doesn't believe Perry needs a constitutional amendment to do the job but that if that was Perry's position, he should add the issue to the special session call. That didn't happen either.

According to Perry, his hands are tied by a 1965 opinion issued by then-Texas Attorney General Waggoner Carr, who concluded that a posthumous pardon is not possible since the inmate in question is dead, and thus, "the pardon not being delivered to the convict during his lifetime, it could not be accepted by him." That's Perry's position, too, it seems - and he's sticking with it. Th egovernor is sorry that lawmakers couldn't get a resolution passed to give him the power, Perry spokeswoman Katherine Cesinger said in a message to the Chronicle earlier this month, but his hands are tied.

But Ellis says that's just not true: The A.G. opinion in question is not binding, and there is nothing in the law that would expressly prohibit Perry from doing the right thing. Indeed, the Lege Council opinion seems to support the position of Ellis and his allies on this issue, Reps. Marc Veasey, D-FortWorth, and Ruth Jones McClendon, D-San Antonio. The notion that an exoneree must be alive to receive a pardon dismisses the so-called "public welfare" view taken by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1927, which ruled that a pardon issued by the president was valid regardless of whether the person was alive to accept it. "The public welfare, not [the] consent" of the person being pardoned, "determines what shall be done," the court ruled. To date, 10 such pardons have been granted in nine states, and two presidents, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, have issued posthumous pardons.

Perry's office did not respond to additional inquiries, and his position ispresumably unchanged.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Obit Magazine on the Texas Death Penalty

"An old adage promises that the only definite things in life are death and taxes. Wrongdoers in the Lone Star state may read that differently: The only thing guaranteed in this life is 'death in Texas.'”

That's the opening of a July 13 article that appeared in Obit, an online magazine that examines life through the lends of death. The article goes on to address recent trends in Texas, particularly with regard to new death sentences. It also features the observations of Jim Willett, the director of the Texas Prison Museum and retired prison official, who noted that the museum receives visitors from all over the world:

“'They’re not so much against the death penalty, although some certainly are, but they’re curious about it all. They just don’t have it where they come from,'” he said.

Willett says it’s not wrong to say that Texans like the death penalty, but that’s not a complete picture of his state.

'We do carry out with the threat,' he says, 'but we’re probably some of the most friendly people in the world.'"
***
Obit soon will publish an article featuring former death house chaplain Reverend Carroll Pickett, so stay tuned!